[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <462A0AA9.8000304@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:29:21 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, nagar@...son.ibm.com,
jlan@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] Taskstats fix the structure members alignment issue
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:13:41 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> We broke the the alignment of members of taskstats to the 8 byte boundary
>> with the CSA patches. In the current kernel, the taskstats structure is
>> not suitable for use by 32 bit applications in a 64 bit kernel.
>>
>
> ugh, that was bad of us.
Yes :-)
>
>> ...
>> The patch adds an __attribute__((aligned(8))) to the
>> taskstats structure members so that 32 bit applications using taskstats
>> can work with a 64 bit kernel.
>
> But there might be 32-bit applications out there which are using the
> present wrong structure?
>
> otoh, I assume that those applications would be using taskstats.h and would
> hence encounter this bug and we would have heard about it, is that correct?
>
Yes, correct.
> otoh^2, 32-bit applications running under 32-bit kernels will presently be
> functioning correctly, and your change will require that those applications
> be recompiled, I think?
>
Yes, correct. They would be broken with this fix. We could bump up the
version TASKSTATS_VERSION to 4. Would you like a new patch the version
bumped up?
>
> This patch looks like 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 material, but very carefully...
Yes, 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 sound correct.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists