[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <462A139A.30805@imap.cc>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:37:30 +0200
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
i4ldeveloper@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Karsten Keil <kkeil@...e.de>
Subject: Re: other potentially deletable, dead stuff
Am 21.04.2007 15:11 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
[...]
>> Removing isdn4linux would constitute a serious regression.
>
> i know. believe me, i *know that*, since i'm fairly sure it was my
> observation that initially started that discussion about isdn4linux.
Sure. I didn't want to suggest otherwise. Sorry if I did.
> i did make it clear in that previous post that all i was doing was
> listing stuff in the source tree that is currently marked with
> "obsolete" or something like that, with no regard to any discussion
> that's taken place about it recently.
Of course, and thanks for that. But I can't just let it stand
uncommented, can I? People might start believing isdn4linux *was*
obsolete because "it was on that list of obsolete items, and nobody
protested."
> all i was interested in was feedback along the lines of, "oh, yeah,
> *that* feature is thoroughly dead and can be tossed," nothing more.
Right. So please don't feel annoyed by my reply. Just take it as a
feedback of "*that* feature definitely isn't dead".
Thanks
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (254 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists