[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1vefpim6n.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:04:16 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Dave Hansen <hansendc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs lockd reclaimer: Convert to kthread API
Dave Hansen <hansendc@...ibm.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 17:19 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> > With pid namespaces all kernel threads will disappear so how do
>> > we cope with the problem when the sysadmin can not see the kernel
>> > threads?
>
> Do they actually always disappear, or do we keep them in the
> init_pid_namespace?
In the init pid namespace but not in any of it's children.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists