| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070421103830.GA16836@elte.hu> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:38:30 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > The modified code is here : > > > > http://linux.1wt.eu/sched/orbitclock-0.2bench.tgz > > > > What is interesting to note is that it's easy to make X work a lot > > (99%) by using 0 as the sleeping time, and it's easy to make the > > process work a lot by using large values for the running time > > associated with very low values (or 0) for the sleep time. > > > > Ah, and it supports -geometry ;-) > > > > It could become a useful scheduler benchmark ! > > i just tried ocbench-0.3, and it is indeed very nice! another thing i just noticed: when starting up lots of ocbench tasks (say -x 6 -y 6) then they (naturally) get started up with an already visible offset. It's nice to observe the startup behavior, but after that it would be useful if it were possible to 'resync' all those ocbench tasks so that they start at the same offset. [ Maybe a "killall -SIGUSR1 ocbench" could serve this purpose, without having to synchronize the tasks explicitly? ] Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists