[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070421231743.GG2986@holomorphy.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:17:43 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
On 4/21/07, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com> wrote:
>> It might be nice if it was possible to actively contribute your CPU
>> time to a child process. For example:
>> int sched_donate(pid_t pid, struct timeval *time, int percentage);
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 12:49:52PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> If you do this, and it has been requested many a times, then please
> generalize it. We have the same issue with futexes. If a FUTEX_WAIT
> call is issues the remaining time in the slot should be given to the
> thread currently owning the futex. For non-PI futexes this needs an
> extension of the interface but I would be up for that. It can have
> big benefits on the throughput of an application.
It's encouraging to hear support for a more full-featured API (or, for
that matter, any response at all) on this front.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists