[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704220711.22432.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 07:11:21 -0400
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr
Subject: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
On Sunday 22 April 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 02:17:02PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> CFS-v4 is quite smooth in terms of the users experience but after
>> prolonged observations approaching 24 hours, it appears to choke the cpu
>> hog off a bit even when the system has nothing else to do. My amanda runs
>> went from 1 to 1.5 hours depending on how much time it took gzip to handle
>> the amount of data tar handed it, up to about 165m & change, or nearly 3
>> hours pretty consistently over 5 runs.
>
>Welcome to infinite history. I'm not surprised, apart from the time
>scale of anomalies being much larger than I anticipated.
[...]
>Pardon my saying so but you appear to be describing anomalous behavior
>in terms of "scheduler warmups."
Well, that was what I saw, it took gzip about 4 or 5 minutes to get to the
first 90% hit in htop's display, and it first hit the top of the display with
only 5%. And the next backup run took about 2h:21m, so we're back in the
ballpark. I'd reset amanda's schedule for a faster dumpcycle too, along with
giving the old girl a new drive, all about the time we started playing with
this, so the times I'm recording now may well be nominal. I suppose I should
boot a plain 2.6.21-rc7 and make a run & time that, but I don't enjoy
masochism THAT much. :)
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
I've enjoyed just about as much of this as I can stand.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists