linux-kernel - Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87647oblx5.fsf@pps.jussieu.fr>
Date:	Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:04:06 +0200
From:	Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@....jussieu.fr>
To:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

> Oh I definitely was not advocating against renicing X,

Why not do it in the X server itself?  This will avoid controversial
policy in the kernel, and have the added advantage of working with
X servers that don't directly access hardware.

Con, if you tell me ``if you're running under Linux and such and such
/sys variable has value so-and-so, then it's definitely a good idea to
call nice(42) at the X server's start up'', then I'll commit it into
X.Org.  (Please CC both me the list, so I can point any people
complaining to the archives.)

                                        Juliusz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/