[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070421155055.242d22dc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:50:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "David Kyle" <dsk6@...t.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@...ibm.com>,
tpm@...horst.net, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Sleep during spinlock in TPM driver
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:11:10 -0400 "David Kyle" <dsk6@...t.edu> wrote:
> I've been working with the TPM driver, and I found that if I opened,
> used, then closed the TPM char device very frequently, I would get a
> kernel BUG message saying that the kernel tried to sleep while holding
> a spinlock. I think I've isolated the problem to this function, in
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c:
>
> int tpm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> struct tpm_chip *chip = file->private_data;
> spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> file->private_data = NULL;
> chip->num_opens--;
> del_singleshot_timer_sync(&chip->user_read_timer);
> flush_scheduled_work();
> atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
> put_device(chip->dev);
> kfree(chip->data_buffer);
> spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_release);
>
> I believe that flush_scheduled_work can sleep, correct? Does anyone
> know why this function is called while the spinlock is held?
>
yup, that's a bug. It's not immediately clear to e what driver_lock is
protecting. Some global things, some per-device things, it appears.
A suitable fix might be to make driver_lock a mutex.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists