linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/28] i386: map enough initial memory to create lowmem mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1d51vxxm4.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:12:51 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/28] i386: map enough initial memory to create lowmem mappings

Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> writes:

> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>   
>>> Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Then we would have seen reports surely?
>>>>       
>
> Yes, I would have thought so.  It surprised me that such an obvious bug
> could be there, apparently for a long time.  But it's real, and
> potentially affects everyone.  It probably doesn't affect highly modular
> distros much, since the kernel itself will be relatively small.
>
>> I never saw a description of the symptoms of encountering this bug.
>> Does it just hang, or what?
>>   
>
> You get an early-fault message on-screen, assuming that's enabled;
> otherwise it will just appear to hang.  It happens in pagetable_init,
> when it allocates a new pagetable above the head.S mapping (8M in my
> case).  It will only hit if the kernel size approaches a 4M boundary,
> since it won't leave enough space mapped to construct the lowmem mappings.
>
> It only affects native booting, since under Xen all those mappings have
> already been constructed.  It happened to me with a paravirt kernel that
> happened to Xen compiled into it, but that was irrelevent (though
> misleading; the 40k difference in kernel size was enough to make it not
> happen in a non-Xen kernel).

I happened to be looking at this stretch of code and I have realized
that this is quite simply the wrong fix.

The problem is that it depends intimately on the details of
alloc_bootmem_pages_low.  Essentially the problem is that when
we are setting up the identity mappings in paging_init we assume
the identity mappings already exist.

If there are holes in the memory map or someone changes the way
pages are returned from alloc_bootmem_pages_low() this code
will break again.

The only way to ensure this will not happen is to do what we do
on x86_64 and map the new page table page into our address space
before we write to it.  Assuming the page we allocate is already
mapped is simply not robust.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/