[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hejmbv1do.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:19:47 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, perex@...e.cz,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions
At Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:26:10 +0200,
I wrote:
>
> At Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:18:07 -0700,
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:34:18 +0200
> > Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Good to hear! I forgot the patch description and sign-off, so here it
> > > is again:
> > >
> > >
> > > [PATCH] ALSA: intel8x0 - Fix Oops in crash kernel
> > >
> > > When intel8x0 driver is loaded in the crash kernel, it gets Oops
> > > occasionally. This is because the irq handler gets called before
> > > the proper hardware initialization. Now defer it after
> > > snd_intel8x0_chip_init().
> >
> > Neat, thanks.
> >
> > Do we think this is safe enough and important enough for 2.6.21?
> > And if so, do you want me to merge it?
>
> It should be safe (as I already merged ALSA tree for 2.6.22), but I'd
> like to test the following before merging 2.6.21:
> - suspend/resume works
> - no severe problem even if request_irq() fails
> I'll check this in this weekend, so let's hold on.
Both seem OK as far as I tested.
So, feel free to push it to 2.6.21 if it's still allowed.
Otherwise I'll queue it up to stable tree later.
Thanks,
Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists