[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704230748270.25463@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MODULE_MAINTAINER
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:33 +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
> > On 04/04/2007 06:38 PM, Rene Herman wrote:
> >
> > Rusty?
>
> Valid points have been made on both sides. I suggest:
>
> #define MODULE_MAINTAINER(_maintainer) \
> MODULE_AUTHOR("(Maintained by) "_maintainer)
why bring MODULE_AUTHOR into it? just define it in terms of
MODULE_INFO:
#define MODULE_MAINTAINER(_m) MODULE_INFO(_m, "(Maintained by)" \
maintainer)
technically, the maintainer is not the same as the author so why
confuse the issue with an extra unnecessary macro expansion?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists