linux-kernel - Re: [mmc] alternative TI FM MMC/SD driver for 2.6.21-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:12:23 +0300
From:	"Sergey Yanovich" <ynvich@...il.com>
To:	"Alex Dubov" <oakad@...oo.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [mmc] alternative TI FM MMC/SD driver for 2.6.21-rc7

> SUBSYSTEM=="tifm", ACTION=="add", TIFM_CARD_TYPE=="SD", RUN+="/sbin/modprobe tifm_sd"

Thanks.

> As a side note: I have some very good reasons for the current driver architecture. You may want to
> look them up in the mail archive (I outlined them during the initial driver submission).

I am not in any way argue that your driver architecture is wrong or that you
should change anything. My point was simple. [tifm_sd] can only work with
[tifm_7xx1]. If you add support for let's say [tifm_8xx2] in the future, which
would have port offsets different that [tifm_7xx1], you would also need a
completely new modules for slots (sd, ms, etc).

--
Sergey Yanovich
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/