[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070423161848.GA27649@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:18:48 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@....net>
Subject: Re: Prevent softlockup triggering in nvidiafb
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:36:30 -0400
> Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > If the chip locks up, we get into a long polling loop,
> > where the softlockup detector kicks in.
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151878
> > for an example.
>
> Surely in this situation the softlockup report and trap out is precisely
> what should be occurring.
We can't do anything useful with the trace. It already prints out
info that the hardware locked up.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists