[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070423162849.GB14113@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:58:49 +0530
From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>
To: Amit Gud <gud@....ksu.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
val_henson@...ux.intel.com, riel@...riel.com, zab@...bo.net,
arjan@...radead.org, brandon@...p.org, karunasagark@...il.com,
gud@....edu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 06:21:34AM -0500, Amit Gud wrote:
>
> This is an initial implementation of ChunkFS technique, briefly discussed
> at: http://lwn.net/Articles/190222 and
> http://cis.ksu.edu/~gud/docs/chunkfs-hotdep-val-arjan-gud-zach.pdf
>
> This implementation is done within ext2 driver. Every chunk is an
> independent ext2 file system. The knowledge about chunks is kept within
> ext2 and 'continuation inodes', which are used to allow files and
> directories span across multiple chunks, are managed within ext2.
>
> At mount time, super blocks for all the chunks are created and linked with
> the global super_blocks list maintained by VFS. This allows independent
> behavior or individual chunks and also helps writebacks to happen
> seamlessly.
>
> Apart from this, chunkfs code in ext2 effectively only provides knowledge
> of:
>
> - what inode's which block number to look for, for a given file's logical
> block number
> - in which chunk to allocate next inode / block
> - number of inodes to scan when a directory is being read
>
> To maintain the ext2's inode number uniqueness property, 8 msb bits of
> inode number are used to indicate the chunk number in which it resides.
>
> As said, this is a preliminary implementation and lots of changes are
> expected before this code is even sanely usable. Some known issues and
> obvious optimizations are listed in the TODO file in the chunkfs patch.
>
> http://cis.ksu.edu/~gud/patches/chunkfs-v0.0.8.patch
> - one big patch
> - applies to 2.6.18
Could you send this out as a patch to ext2 codebase, so we can just look
at the changes for chunkfs ? That might also make it small enough
to inline your patch in email for review.
What kind of results are you planning to gather to evaluate/optimize this ?
Regards
Suparna
>
> Attached - ext2-chunkfs-diff.patch.gz
> - since the code is a spin-off of ext2, this patch explains better what
> has changed from the ext2.
>
> git://cislinux.cis.ksu.edu/chunkfs-tools
> - mkfs, and fsck for chunkfs.
>
> http://cis.ksu.edu/~gud/patches/config-chunkfs-2.6.18-uml
> - config file used; tested mostly on UML with loopback file systems.
>
> NOTE: No xattrs and xips yet, CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR and CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP
> should be "no" for clean compile.
>
>
> Please comment, suggest, criticize. Patches most welcome.
>
>
> Best,
> AG
> --
> May the source be with you.
> http://www.cis.ksu.edu/~gud
--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@...ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists