| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:53:25 +0200 From: "Guillaume Chazarain" <guichaz@...oo.fr> To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>, "Juliusz Chroboczek" <jch@....jussieu.fr>, "Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>, "ck list" <ck@....kolivas.org>, "Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@....com>, "Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>, "William Lee Irwin III" <wli@...omorphy.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>, "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>, "Peter Williams" <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr, "Gene Heskett" <gene.heskett@...il.com> Subject: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44 2007/4/23, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>: > p->wait_runtime >>= 1; > p_to->wait_runtime += p->wait_runtime; I have no problem with clients giving some credit to X, I am more concerned with X giving half of its credit to a single client, a quarter of its credit to another client, etc... For example, a client could setup a periodical wake up from X, and then periodically getting some credit for free. Would that be possible? Thanks. -- Guillaume - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists