[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070423231926.GA684@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:19:26 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, ego@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vatsa@...ibm.com, paulmck@...ibm.com,
pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/3] freezer: Introduce freezer_flags
On 04/24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 24 April 2007 00:55, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 04/24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > Should I clear it in dup_task_struct() or is there a better place?
> >
> > I personally think we should do this in dup_task_struct(). In fact, I believe
> > it is better to replace the
> >
> > *tsk = *orig;
> >
> > with some helper (like setup_thread_stack() below), and that helper clears
> > ->freezer_flags. Say, copy_task_struct().
>
> Hmm, wouldn't that be overkill? copy_task_struct() would have to do
> *tsk = *orig anyway, and we only need to clear one field apart from this.
>
> Some other fields are cleared towards the end of dup_task_struct(), so perhaps
> we could clear freezer_flags in there too?
Yes. And I strongly believe it is bad we don't have the helper which does some
random stuf like "p->did_exec = 0".
The same for thread_info. Could you answer quickly where do we clear TIF_FREEZE
currently? We don't.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists