[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070423012509.GA25162@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:25:09 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:12:29AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> i'm pleased to announce release -v5 of the CFS scheduler patchset. The
> patch against v2.6.21-rc7 and v2.6.20.7 can be downloaded from:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/
>
> this CFS release mainly fixes regressions and improves interactivity:
>
> 13 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-)
>
> the biggest user-visible change in -v5 are various interactivity
> improvements (especially under higher load) to fix reported regressions,
> and an improved way of handling nice levels. There's also a new
> sys_sched_yield_to() syscall implementation for i686 and x86_64.
>
> All known regressions have been fixed. (knock on wood)
I think the granularity is still much too low. Why not increase it to
something more reasonable as a default?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists