linux-kernel - Re: crash with CFS v4 and qemu/kvm (was: [patch] CFS scheduler, v4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200704241254.13791.mail@earthworm.de>
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:54:12 +0200
From:	Christian Hesse <mail@...thworm.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
	kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: crash with CFS v4 and qemu/kvm (was: [patch] CFS scheduler, v4)

On Monday 23 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Christian Hesse <mail@...thworm.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 20 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > i'm pleased to announce release -v4 of the CFS patchset.
> >
> > Hi Ingo, hi Avi, hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to use kvm-20 with cfs v4 and get a crash:
> >
> > eworm@...o:~$ /usr/local/kvm/bin/qemu -snapshot
> > /mnt/data/virtual/qemu/winxp.img kvm_run: failed entry, reason 7
> > kvm_run returned -8
> >
> > It works (though it is a bit slow) if I start qemu with strace, so for
> > me it looks like a race condition?
>
> hm. Can you work it around with:
>
>    echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity_ns
>
> ?
>
> If yes then this is a wakeup race: some piece of code relies on the
> upstream scheduler preempting the waker task immediately in 99% of the
> cases.
>
> and you might want to test -v5 too which i released earlier today. It
> has no bugfix in this area though, so it will likely still trigger this
> race - but it will also hopefully be even more pleasant to use than -v4
> ;-)

Hi Ingo,

This was kvm's fault. It works perfectly now without modifications to the 
scheduler. If anybody is interested in details please see the kvm mailing 
list archives.
-- 
Regards,
Chris

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)