[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <462E1D37.3060008@dawes.za.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:07:35 +0200
From: Rogan Dawes <lists@...es.za.net>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@....jussieu.fr>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
Chris Friesen wrote:
> Rogan Dawes wrote:
>
>> I guess my point was if we somehow get to an odd number of
>> nanoseconds, we'd end up with rounding errors. I'm not sure if your
>> algorithm will ever allow that.
>
> And Ingo's point was that when it takes thousands of nanoseconds for a
> single context switch, an error of half a nanosecond is down in the noise.
>
> Chris
My concern was that since Ingo said that this is a closed economy, with
a fixed sum/total, if we lose a nanosecond here and there, eventually
we'll lose them all.
Some folks have uptimes of multiple years.
Of course, I could (very likely!) be full of it! ;-)
Rogan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists