lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704232031040.10676@camaro.cis.ksu.edu>
Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:38:01 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Amit Gud <gud@....ksu.edu>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...syssoft.com>,
	Karuna sagar K <karunasagark@...il.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ChunkFS - measuring cross-chunk references

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Amit Gud wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>> 
>> >  The other thing which we should consider is that chunkfs really
>> >  requires a 64-bit inode number space, which means either we only allow
>>
>>  does it?
>>  I'd think it needs a "chunk space" number and a 32 bit local inode
>>  number ;) (same for blocks)
>> 
>
> For inodes, yes, either 64-bit inode or some field for the chunk id in which 
> the inode is. But for block numbers, you don't. Because individual chunks 
> manage part of the whole file system in an independent way. They have their 
> block bitmaps starting at an offset. Inode bitmaps, however, remains same.
>

In that sense, we also can do away without having chunk identifier encoded 
into inode number and chunkfs would still be fine with it. But we will 
then loose inode uniqueness property, which could well be OK as it is with 
other file systems in which inode number is not sufficient for unique 
identification of an inode.


AG
--
May the source be with you.
http://www.cis.ksu.edu/~gud
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ