lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:11:01 -0500
From:	"Marcos Pinto" <markybob@...il.com>
To:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc:	"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@...hat.com>, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20.7 locking up hard on boot

I can confirm that reverting commit
7639e962234c76031d1ddf436def7fd9602be560 fixes the problem.  Also,
there seem to be plenty of other people reporting the same boot
locking:

http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/msg/cc0453677be44a9e
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=245313
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6845
http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive/topic.php/t-757515.html

Please consider reverting this patch in upstream.
Thank you for your time,
Marcos

On 4/23/07, Marcos Pinto <markybob@...il.com> wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> > Given that all of the reports are in cases when the adjustment is *not*
> > being done (and only a message is being printed), I can only assume that
> > the breakage results from the adding of PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO
> > into the resource flags. I considered this unconditional setting of the flags
> > odd already in the original code, and added this extra flag only for
> > consistency reasons (because the settings reported by X indicated that
> > this was missing). Perhaps the adjustment (original and the added
> > extra flag) shouldn't be done if IORESOURCE_IO wasn't already set.
> > Perhaps one of those seeing the issue could try out returning from the
> > function right after that printk(), without any adjustment to the flags.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ