[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070424193607.GB16503@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:36:07 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
kernel-discuss@...dhelds.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class
Hi!
> > > > That said, you may need to use uWh and uAh instead of mAh and mWh, though.
> > >
> > > Not sure. Is there any existing chip that can report uAh/uWh? That is
> > > great precision.
> >
> > The way things are going, it should be feasible for small embedded systems
> > quite soon. Refer to the previous thread.
>
> I see... is it also applicable to currents and voltages? I.e. should we
> use uA and uV from the start?
AFAICT, mobile phone in standby can eat less than 1000 uW... so uA/uV
would indeed be nice.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists