linux-kernel - Re: [Intel IOMMU][patch 8/8] Preserve some Virtual Address when devices cannot address entire range.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200704242312.54738.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:12:54 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org, gregkh@...e.de,
	muli@...ibm.com, asit.k.mallick@...el.com,
	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel IOMMU][patch 8/8] Preserve some Virtual Address when devices cannot address entire range.

On Tuesday 24 April 2007 22:33:04 Ashok Raj wrote:

> With PCIE there is some benefit to keep dma addr low for performance reasons, 
> since it will use 	32bit Transaction level packets instead of 64bit.
> 
> This reservation is only required if we have some legacy device under a p2p 
> where its required to share its addr space with other devices. We could 
> implement a default when one is not specified to keep things simple.

We already have a couple of other IOMMU architectures who essentially have the same
problem. Have you checked how they solve this?

-Andi



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/