[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c0942db0704241524r46e02657q22141ae07d5296fc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:24:52 -0700
From: "Ray Lee" <madrabbit@...il.com>
To: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nigel Cunningham" <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
"Christian Hesse" <mail@...thworm.de>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>, "Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
On 4/24/07, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > so, while it's probably apples to oranges, uswsusp seems to be larger,
> > while there's at least one feature that it is missing.
>
> (We are talking "save 100% memory" here).
>
> As I said, that one feature is doable in uswsusp, too. It is 200
> lines. It also makes mm <-> swsusp interaction _way_ more complex, and
Sounds like the perfect reason to put that in kernel space.
Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists