linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/15] CFQ IO scheduler patch series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:42:07 -0400
From:	"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/15] CFQ IO scheduler patch series

Using the patches posted yesterday 
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117740312628325&w=2) here are some 
quick read results (as measured by iostat over a 5 minute period, taken 
in 6 second intervals) on a 4-way IA64 box with 42 disks (24 FC and 18 
U320), 42 processes (1 per disk) with 256 AIOs (16KB) outstanding at all 
times per device:

2.6.21-rc7:                                           1,006.023 MB/second
2.6.21-rc7 + new CFQ IO scheduler: 1,030.767 MB/second

showing about a 2.46% performance improvement with a 2.43% increase in 
%system used (3.738% -> 3.829%).

Interestingly enough this patch also seems to remove some noise during 
the run - see the chart at http://free.linux.hp.com/~adb/cfq/rkb_s.png

Alan D. Brunelle
HP / Open Source and Linux Organization / Scalability and Performance Group

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/