linux-kernel - Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.98.0704251111000.18512@sigma.j-a-k-j.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:13:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>
To:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

> I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see 
> your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp.  What would make this 
> infeasible?

For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want multiple 
competing suspend algorithms like this in the kernel at once. (If I parsed 
his message correctly, he doesn't want any in the kernel, but he's putting 
up with it because it seems somewhat needed.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/