[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <462F75FF.5090008@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:38:39 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>
CC: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>,
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix abs() macro to work with types wider than int
John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
>>>> I think it's like it is just to be consistent with abs() in C,
>>>> which also contains labs() and llabs().
>>>>
>>> We actually had labs() before (few months ago), but since it was not
>>> used, and if it would it seemed better to just fix abs(), it was
>>> removed. So I think this is the appropriate way to go.
>> Sounds like when someone actually needs labs() or llabs()
>> they can submit a patch for however they would like to use it.
>
> However they would like to use *abs()? What different ways are possible to
> take the arithmetic absolute value? I see record of many cases where
> dozens of authors have macros that then get collapsed to include files. So
> why not avoid that annoyance this time and -start- with it in the include
> files?
>
> Can there even be any reason beyond unnecessary pedantics to have
> [l[l]]abs?
See Paragraph 1 above. We do lots of functions in a manner that is
like C (or libc) so that we don't confuse developers.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists