[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070425112133.4ae86399.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:21:33 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
mb@...sch.de, linville@...driver.com, arnd@...db.de,
maxextreme@...il.com, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:45:34 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:11:23 +0200
> Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> > I've added the results of the review to the Kconfig cleanup patches
> > for s390. Patch #2 has been split, one half has all the HAS_IOMEM
> > depends lines the other the remaining !S390 depends lines.
> >
> > Andrew: I plan to add patches 1-5 to the for-andrew branch of the
> > git390 repository if that is fine with you. The only thing that will
> > be missing in the tree is the patch that disables wireless for s390.
> > The code does compile but without hardware it is mute to have the
> > config options. I'll wait until the git-wireless.patch is upstream.
> > Patches 7-9 depend on patches found in -mm.
> >
>
> umm, OK. If it's Ok I think I'll duck it for now: -mm is full.
>
> Over-full, really: I've been working basically continuously since Friday
> getting the current dungpile to compile and boot, and it's still miles away
> from that.
and I continue to be concerned about the amount of patch reviews
compared to new patch material overall (not just s390).
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists