[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070425201309.GA5646@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:13:09 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Li, Tong N" <tong.n.li@...el.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@....jussieu.fr>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:58:40AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Adjustments to the lag computation for for arrivals and departures
> during execution are among the missing pieces. Some algorithmic devices
> are also needed to account for the varying growth rates of lags of tasks
> waiting to run, which arise from differing priorities/weights.
that was the principle of my proposal of sorting tasks by expected completion
time and using +/- credit to compensate for too large/too short slice used.
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists