[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704251323000.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Christian Hesse <mail@...thworm.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2:
hang in atomic copy)
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Please ask anyone who's worked with me if he's had any problem with that.
> If anyone say I'm unable to work with anybody else, I'd say you're right. Till
> then, I feel offended.
I'll apologise (and virtually kiss your hairy feet) if you could actually
show me a single implementation that people can agree on.
But until then, I claim that the suspend-to-disk people cannot work with
each other.
And no, "three different implementations" doesn't cut it. Even _two_ is
too much. We need to get *rid* of something, not add more.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists