[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704251556160.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc: Kenneth Crudup <kenny@...ix.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2:
hang in atomic copy)
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Suspend syncs caches/spins down. Freeze does not do anything.
>
> That's okay, I keep claiming "freeze" is subset of "suspend". Can you
> name device where that is not true?
Sure. Like just about any PCI device that doesn't do things on its own.
A "freeze" does nothing at all, or perhaps shuts down the reader side
(for something like a network controller).
A "suspend" does "write D3 to the suspend register". Absolutely zero in
common.
> Remember we do
>
> suspend(PMSG_FREEZE)
> atomic snapshot
> resume()
> write snapshot.
AND THAT IS STUPID. It mixes up "suspend()" and creating a snapshot in
ways that are totally idiotic. There is nothing in common!
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists