[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1177490913.30284.38.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-04>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:48:33 +0200
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Christian Hesse <mail@...thworm.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2:
hang in atomic copy)
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 07:23 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I absolutely detest all suspend-to-disk crap. Quite frankly, I hate the
> > whole thing. I think they've _all_ caused problems for the "true" suspend
> > (suspend-to-ram), and the last thing I want to see is three or four
>
> Well, it is a bit more complex than that.
>
> suspend-to-disk is a workaround for
>
> 'suspend-to-ram eats too much power' (plus some details like
> being able to replace battery).
>
> suspend-to-ram is a workaround for
>
> 'idle machine takes way too much power' (plus some details
> like don't spin the disk so that machine is safe to carry).
I think it depends on who you ask. I personally think that suspend-to-
$youchoose is a workaround for the slowness of system startup. I never
turn off my laptop, I just suspend it.
(And guess what, it uses APM and suspend is really faster and way more
reliable than each kernel implementation I could try).
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists