[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46305222.60502@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:17:54 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC: David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>
>>>Nick, what's the buffer layer? Are you talking about operations
>>>based on bufferheads?
>>
>>Yeah. Our pgoff_t->sector_t translation.
>
>
> Sadly the buffers in the buffer layer still assume contiguous memory. You
> would have to add a series of pointers there and then add a layer to
> handle this.
That's the least of the problems with rewriting the buffer layer.
But I maintain that the end result is better than the fragmentation
based approach. A lot of people don't actually want a bigger page
cache size, because they want efficient internal fragmentation as
well, so your radix-tree based approach isn't really comparable.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists