| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200704261004.00220.oneukum@suse.de> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:03:59 +0200 From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> To: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@...ervon.org> Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 08:46 schrieb Daniel Barkalow: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Number of different known regressions compared to 2.6.20 at the time > > of the 2.6.21 release: > > 14 > > I count 13. (v2) had 15 items, of which 2 were subsequently fixed or found > to be inapplicable. > > > Number of different known regressions compared to 2.6.20 at the time > > of the 2.6.21 release with patches available at the time of the 2.6.21 > > release [1]: > > 3 > > The -stable team can presumably take care of these in 2.6.21.1, right? > That leaves 10 that need developer attention. > > John Stultz seems to be taking care of 3 of them. > > Oliver Neukum has 1. Which I haven't succeeded in reproducing and gotten no further info on. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists