linux-kernel - Re: Back to the future.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:38:45 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Back to the future.


On Apr 26 2007 16:04, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
>Hi again.
>
>So - trying to get back to the original discussion - what (if anything)
>do you see as the way ahead?
>
>The options I can think of are (starting with things I can do):
>
>1) [...]
>2) [...]
>3) [...]
>4) [...]
>5) [...]
>6) [...]
>7) [...]

Perhaps do it the EVMS way? Do as much in userspace as possible, and
trying having a simple kernel API at the same time.
Perhaps (3) would be it, but ask Redhat _first_ before quitting anything :)


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/