| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:12:12 +0200
From: Michael Gerdau <mgd@...hnosis.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@....jussieu.fr>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: [REPORT] cfs-v6-rc2 vs sd-0.46 vs 2.6.21-rc7
Hi list,
find below a test comparing
2.6.21-rc7 (mainline)
2.6.21-rc7-sd046
2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v6-rc2(*) (X @ nice 0)
2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v6-rc2(*) (X @ nice -10)
running on a dualcore x86_64.
(*) At the time I started the tests, 2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v6 was not yet
available. I don't know whether the changes from -v6-rc2 would
have had an impact on the results.
The 3 tasks perform extensive computations on some data that is
initially loaded from disk. Each completed run (1711 per task in
total) in saved in a PostgreSQL DB running on the same machine
I do provide actual start and end timestamp of each task.
Each task is run via 'time'; those figures are provided as well.
Last not least the timevalues given from "within" the perl script
are provided by calling the perl builtin function "times" which
(hopefully) gives user time (among other things).
Note that both mainline and cfs did finish the jobs in the order
LTMM, LTMB, LTBM while sd had them finished in the order LTMM,
LTBM, LTMB. Also sd had the shortest time to have all three
finished while cfs was the first to finish LTMM (the fastest of
the three jobs).
I don't really know the reason for these differences:
LTMM, LTMB and LTBM all do similar things though there are differences.
LTMM is indeed the job that involves the least computations but I have
not yet tried to find out in what order of magnitude. I could if that
would be of interest though it would involve extensive analysis and
partly depends on the data processed and I'm not keen to do that.
I have not extensively checked how stable these figures are w/r to
repeated reruns as a single run takes roughly 3h, but I have repeated
one run and that produced basically the same timing.
One remark regarding cfs with X niced to -10 and 0:
I have not really seen much difference in terms of usage experience
between the two. If at all I have the impression that at nice -10
under KDE some apps (namely kontact and the helper it is using) have
a higher probability to actually "take over" the desktop but so far
this is just a vague impression (read: have not been able to reproduce).
On the other hand I have not seen degradations with nice 0 either and
thus my gut feeling prefers cfs nice 0. Thanks to the bootparam
privileged_nice_level=0 this is easy to achieve.
When comparing cfs nice 0 and sd I have not been able to see any
real difference w/r to desktop responsiveness. But then I have not
tried to stresstest the desktop while running the above benchmarks
either.
Anyway, here are the numbers. Feel free to ask whenever something
is unclear. GC2 is the name of the dataset processed.
2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v6-rc2 (X @ nice -10)
====================================
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity_ns=6000000
Start of all 3 jobs: 10:03:01.933
Job LTMM End: 12:25:57.214
GC2 20070101 LTMM Thu Apr 26 12:25:20.844 2007: 142.42 Min., 4.9942 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl fertig nach 5484.580s(CPU) und 8574 Sek.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.79 ~ 0.7900
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 5469.91 ~ 3.1969
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.26 ~ 0.0002
real 142m56.806s
user 91m24.871s
sys 0m13.257s
Job LTMB End: 12:57:14.624
GC2 20070101 LTMB Thu Apr 26 12:56:52.295 2007: 173.90 Min., 6.0982 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl fertig nach 7544.170s(CPU) und 10449 Sek.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 1.37 ~ 1.3700
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 7529.12 ~ 4.4004
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.27 ~ 0.0002
real 174m10.404s
user 125m44.484s
sys 0m15.293s
Job LTBM End: 12:59:47.879
GC2 20070101 LTBM Thu Apr 26 12:59:30.257 2007: 176.55 Min., 6.1911 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl fertig nach 7584.040s(CPU) und 10607 Sek.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.82 ~ 0.8200
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 7569.56 ~ 4.4241
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.25 ~ 0.0001
real 176m50.446s
user 126m24.490s
sys 0m15.689s
From fairly early during the job:
top - 10:07:02 up 1:07, 9 users, load average: 3.18, 1.83, 0.84
Tasks: 3 total, 3 running, 0 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 99.3%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 3348632k total, 1377624k used, 1971008k free, 51748k buffers
Swap: 2097144k total, 0k used, 2097144k free, 674288k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
13938 mgd 20 0 92780 17m 3668 R 100 0.5 2:31.04 perl
13937 mgd 20 0 93884 18m 3672 R 50 0.6 2:51.31 perl
13940 mgd 20 0 93864 18m 3668 R 50 0.6 2:28.69 perl
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
3 0 0 1954320 52516 688484 0 0 0 71 430 927 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 1954412 52532 688496 0 0 0 49 433 942 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1954012 52556 688492 0 0 0 159 452 1203 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953924 52584 688476 0 0 0 141 444 961 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953964 52584 688512 0 0 0 0 470 1170 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953980 52600 688516 0 0 0 83 490 1144 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953948 52600 688524 0 0 0 0 503 1303 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953852 52624 688524 0 0 0 97 503 1394 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 1953852 52640 688512 0 0 0 96 496 1474 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953332 52656 688524 0 0 3 93 487 1556 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 1953272 52672 688536 0 0 0 65 494 1483 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953264 52684 688548 0 0 0 39 486 1452 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953216 52692 688576 0 0 3 44 436 983 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 1953264 52708 688564 0 0 0 61 437 911 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953264 52708 688580 0 0 0 0 420 896 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1953172 52732 688584 0 0 0 67 437 913 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 1952948 52740 688584 0 0 0 73 466 1720 99 1 0 0
3 0 0 1952996 52772 688572 0 0 1 109 470 1173 99 0 1 0
3 0 0 1952996 52788 688580 0 0 0 47 479 1491 89 10 1 0
3 0 0 1952996 52796 688588 0 0 0 19 464 1101 95 5 0 0
3 0 0 1952964 52836 688584 0 0 0 179 461 1072 100 0 0 0
2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v6-rc2 (X @ nice 0)
==================================
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity_ns=6000000
Start of all 3 jobs: 15:13:57.802
Job LTMM End: 17:19:53.494
GC2 20070101 LTMM Wed Apr 25 17:19:18.802 2007: 125.45 Min., 4.3992 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 5472.800s(CPU) and 7555 Sec.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.79 ~ 0.7900
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 5458.31 ~ 3.1901
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.25 ~ 0.0001
real 125m58.235s
user 91m13.034s
sys 0m15.925s
Job LTMB End: 18:04:45.556
GC2 20070101 LTMB Wed Apr 25 18:04:22.411 2007: 170.47 Min., 5.9778 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 7646.700s(CPU) and 10243 Sec.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.98 ~ 0.9800
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 7632.08 ~ 4.4606
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.19 ~ 0.0001
real 170m48.445s
user 127m26.950s
sys 0m13.705s
Job LTBM End: 18:13:45.927
GC2 20070101 LTBM Wed Apr 25 18:13:27.382 2007: 179.57 Min., 6.2969 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 7623.300s(CPU) and 10789 Sec.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.85 ~ 0.8500
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 7607.95 ~ 4.4465
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.26 ~ 0.0002
real 179m51.230s
user 127m3.580s
sys 0m10.769s
From fairly early during the job:
top - 15:17:43 up 21 min, 9 users, load average: 3.35, 2.58, 2.10
Tasks: 3 total, 3 running, 0 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 99.8%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 3348632k total, 1624044k used, 1724588k free, 64272k buffers
Swap: 2097144k total, 0k used, 2097144k free, 940176k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
30042 mgd 20 0 92752 17m 3668 R 100 0.5 2:51.25 perl
30038 mgd 20 0 93884 18m 3668 R 50 0.6 1:59.39 perl
30040 mgd 20 0 93624 18m 3668 R 50 0.6 2:32.13 perl
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
4 0 0 1720424 65132 940632 0 0 0 1 424 963 100 0 0 0
6 0 0 1720448 65152 940612 0 0 0 79 441 1030 100 0 0 0
7 0 0 1720448 65152 940636 0 0 0 45 442 1003 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1720424 65168 940620 0 0 0 76 451 1130 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 1720384 65168 940640 0 0 0 0 431 913 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1720880 65200 940644 0 0 0 105 455 1080 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1719936 65208 940656 0 0 0 87 442 1302 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1720060 65216 940660 0 0 0 81 438 973 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1720560 65244 940644 0 0 0 88 437 998 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1720548 65252 940664 0 0 0 59 435 955 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1720548 65260 940664 0 0 0 39 429 918 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1720572 65268 940688 0 0 3 33 434 935 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1720572 65276 940696 0 0 0 31 433 969 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1719928 65296 940700 0 0 0 155 453 1362 99 1 0 0
3 0 0 1719944 65316 940680 0 0 0 69 436 1025 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 1719772 65372 940712 0 0 1 277 460 1207 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1719756 65380 940704 0 0 0 44 441 1142 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1719756 65388 940720 0 0 0 47 436 1094 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1719780 65396 940736 0 0 3 35 439 1043 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 1719400 65412 940736 0 0 0 87 616 1306 100 1 0 0
3 0 0 1719400 65420 940736 0 0 0 51 440 1033 100 0 0 0
2.6.21-rc7-sd046
================
/proc/sys/kernel/rr_interval=16
Start of all 3 jobs: 11:39:54.650
Job LTMM End: 14:00:07.868
GC2 20070101 LTMM Wed Apr 25 13:59:32.209 2007: 139.73 Min., 4.9001 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 5448.340s(CPU) and 8413 Sec.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.38 ~ 0.3800
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 5434.63 ~ 3.1763
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.21 ~ 0.0001
real 140m16.127s
user 90m48.597s
sys 0m12.389s
Job LTBM End: 14:32:40.408
GC2 20070101 LTBM Wed Apr 25 14:32:19.259 2007: 172.48 Min., 6.0485 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 7555.780s(CPU) and 10365 Sec.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.39 ~ 0.3900
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 7541.47 ~ 4.4076
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.18 ~ 0.0001
real 172m48.009s
user 125m56.188s
sys 0m16.689s
Job LTMB End: 14:35:07.261
GC2 20070101 LTMB Wed Apr 25 14:34:50.896 2007: 175.02 Min., 6.1373 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 7612.750s(CPU) and 10514 Sec.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.33 ~ 0.3300
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 7599.43 ~ 4.4415
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.29 ~ 0.0002
real 175m17.481s
user 126m53.160s
sys 0m16.437s
From fairly early during the job:
top - 11:43:24 up 1:43, 9 users, load average: 3.86, 2.35, 1.21
Tasks: 3 total, 3 running, 0 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 99.5%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 3348628k total, 3212640k used, 135988k free, 435744k buffers
Swap: 2097144k total, 0k used, 2097144k free, 1089812k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
17563 mgd 11 0 92872 17m 3668 R 100 0.5 2:43.97 perl
17568 mgd 33 0 93932 18m 3668 R 50 0.6 1:48.49 perl
17570 mgd 31 0 93652 18m 3668 R 50 0.6 2:14.16 perl
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
4 0 0 125052 436832 1093420 0 0 0 87 932 1464 99 1 0 0
7 0 0 125060 436832 1093428 0 0 0 0 933 1306 99 1 0 0
3 0 0 125256 436852 1093408 0 0 0 120 831 1336 99 1 0 0
3 0 0 124804 436864 1093440 0 0 0 165 443 1374 99 1 0 0
3 0 0 124804 436864 1093440 0 0 0 0 421 955 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 124812 436884 1093440 0 0 0 113 440 989 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 124812 436884 1093440 0 0 0 63 436 936 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 124804 436900 1093448 0 0 0 64 485 1142 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 124804 436912 1093436 0 0 0 47 434 992 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 124804 436920 1093448 0 0 0 24 448 978 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 124656 436932 1093448 0 0 0 120 443 1850 99 1 0 0
3 0 0 124648 436932 1093464 0 0 0 0 441 1081 99 1 0 0
8 0 0 124688 436952 1093464 0 0 0 156 432 924 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 124976 436960 1093472 0 0 0 43 439 1028 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 125100 436968 1093472 0 0 0 27 426 961 100 0 0 0
10 0 0 125132 436976 1093480 0 0 0 43 427 876 100 0 0 0
6 0 0 125132 436984 1093480 0 0 0 28 440 1087 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 124868 437000 1093484 0 0 0 133 445 1629 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 124392 437056 1093456 0 0 0 356 483 1072 99 1 0 0
3 0 0 124400 437056 1093496 0 0 0 0 429 1069 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 124400 437072 1093488 0 0 0 80 441 1000 100 0 0 0
2.6.21-rc7
==========
Start of all 3 jobs: 20:11:45.971
Job LTMM End: 22:25:33.108
GC2 20070101 LTMM Wed Apr 25 22:25:07.427 2007: 133.45 Min., 4.6797 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 5462.240s(CPU) and 8026 Sek.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.77 ~ 0.7700
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 5447.89 ~ 3.1840
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.29 ~ 0.0002
real 133m50.274s
user 91m2.485s
sys 0m10.801s
Job LTMB End: 23:01:54.763
GC2 20070101 LTMB Wed Apr 25 23:01:35.274 2007: 169.88 Min., 5.9573 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 7452.300s(CPU) and 10208 Sek.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.76 ~ 0.7600
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 7438.33 ~ 4.3474
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.25 ~ 0.0001
real 170m12.885s
user 124m12.562s
sys 0m14.705s
Job LTBM End: 23:09:16.506
GC2 20070101 LTBM Wed Apr 25 23:08:59.376 2007: 177.28 Min., 6.2168 sec/run (1711 runs)
Ranking-3.pl finished after 7673.940s(CPU) and 10652 Sek.
times: bewerteUmgeb # 1 Su 0.78 ~ 0.7800
times: evalMarkt # 1711 Su 7659.10 ~ 4.4764
times: writeDB # 1711 Su 0.30 ~ 0.0002
real 177m35.890s
user 127m54.376s
sys 0m9.873s
From fairly early during the job:
top - 20:15:13 up 12 min, 9 users, load average: 3.89, 2.61, 1.52
Tasks: 3 total, 3 running, 0 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 99.8%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 3348628k total, 1109020k used, 2239608k free, 28820k buffers
Swap: 2097144k total, 0k used, 2097144k free, 511352k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
6389 mgd 25 0 92776 17m 3668 R 100 0.5 2:50.23 perl
6390 mgd 25 0 93932 18m 3668 R 53 0.6 2:08.47 perl
6393 mgd 25 0 93880 18m 3668 R 47 0.6 1:42.53 perl
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
6 0 0 2211984 30780 525612 0 0 0 0 490 1318 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 2211460 30872 525576 0 0 8 795 489 1052 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 2211736 30896 525620 0 0 0 129 467 1003 99 1 0 0
7 0 0 2211024 30896 525624 0 0 0 97 469 1234 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 2211080 30924 525624 0 0 0 147 472 1117 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 2211008 30936 525616 0 0 0 35 467 1086 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 2210792 30976 525632 0 0 0 144 480 1120 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 2210932 30992 525620 0 0 0 47 462 1099 99 1 0 0
3 0 0 2210948 31000 525644 0 0 0 40 460 1087 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 2210980 31016 525648 0 0 0 41 453 898 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 2210716 31036 525648 0 0 1 99 471 1322 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 2210748 31052 525648 0 0 0 60 454 1085 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 2210764 31080 525652 0 0 0 68 463 1007 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 2210796 31080 525656 0 0 0 68 462 962 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 2210812 31104 525664 0 0 0 97 470 1193 100 0 0 0
5 0 0 2210812 31104 525664 0 0 0 0 451 911 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 2210812 31128 525672 0 0 0 69 465 1100 100 0 0 0
3 0 0 2210300 31152 525660 0 0 0 143 466 1350 99 1 0 0
4 0 0 2210292 31152 525676 0 0 3 9 513 2025 100 0 0 0
6 0 0 2210624 31196 525700 0 0 3 133 492 1207 100 0 0 0
4 0 0 2210460 31196 525720 0 0 0 0 458 1086 100 0 0 0
Best,
Michael
--
Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar
Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg
Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
Michael Gerdau email: mgd@...hnosis.de
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists