| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070426112750.GT17387@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:27:50 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>, Christian Hesse <mail@...thworm.de>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) Hi! > > We do not want to fragment the testing base, and suspend2 does not > > really have any interesting features over uswsusp. > > The testing base is already fragmented! > > What the current situation means is that you simply never hear from > the people who get fed up with suspend but who manage to get suspend2 > working. Well, and what can I do? I can wait for suspend2 to slowly disappear on their own. Merging suspend2 would just make testing base _more_ fragmented then it is today. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists