[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070426141455.GA6155@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:14:55 -0400
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To: Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Nikita Danilov <nikita@...sterfs.com>,
David Lang <david.lang@...italinsight.com>,
Amit Gud <gud@....ksu.edu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...riel.com, zab@...bo.net,
arjan@...radead.org, suparna@...ibm.com, brandon@...p.org,
karunasagark@...il.com, gud@....edu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:47:10PM -0700, Valerie Henson wrote:
> Actually, there is an upper limit on the number of continuation
> inodes. Each file can have a maximum of one continuation inode per
> chunk. (This is why we need to support sparse files.)
How about this case:
Growing file starts in chunk A.
Overflows into chunk B.
Delete file in chunk A.
Growing file overflows chunk B and spots new free space in
chunk A (and nothing anywhere else)
Overflows into chunk A
Delete file in chunk B.
Overflow into chunk B again.
Maybe this is not realistic, but in the absence of a mechanism to pull
data back from an overflow chunk, it seems at least a theoretical
possibility that there could be > 1 continuation inodes per file per
chunk.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists