[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qlG9V8pP.1177603830.8836760.penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:10:30 +0300 (EEST)
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: rjw@...k.pl
CC: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>,
"Dumitru Ciobarcianu" <Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@...s.ro>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nigel Cunningham" <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
"Christian Hesse" <mail@...thworm.de>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>, "Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>,
"suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net"
<suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
On 4/26/2007, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> In principle, we could add suspend2 as an alternative (in analogy with the I/O
> schedulers, for example), but I think for this purpose it should be reviewed
> properly.
Yeah, this makes sense.
On 4/26/2007, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> There also is a real problem with how it uses the LRU pages. It _seems_ to
> work, but at least to me it seems to be potentially dangerous.
I am new to suspend2 so can you please explain what exactly is dangerous
about it?
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists