lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4630D154.7050708@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:20:36 -0700
From:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC:	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
	David Acker <dacker@...net.com>,
	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFT] e100 driver on ARM

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Kok, Auke wrote:
>> Jeff, I think I should just push the IO patch and the sbit code to 
>> Andrew and have it sit there. That is a vastly larger test resource than 
>> we currently can generate for this. If needed we just let is sit there 
>> for a whole release cycle before moving it to #upstream.
> 
> The sbit code has been in -mm via netdev-2.6.git#ALL for many months 
> now.  I am certainly open to adding any number of "for -mm only" style 
> patches that you wish to pass along, for /any/ driver: e100, e1000, ixgb.

I think we should then just bite the bullet and move it over to #upstream for 
2.6.22, that gives us another full release cycle to monitor it.

I'll post 2 patches in a second. the first is for upstream and allows the driver 
to run with an invalid mac address in case the user overrides the eeprom 
checksum (in which case the mac address could likely be wrong). The second one 
is the I/O mode patch and for Andrew (MM), allthough the I/O mode is disabled by 
default, so it should be safe to put in upstream as well, but I leave that up to 
you to decide.

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ