[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4630D724.70901@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:45:24 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MODULE_MAINTAINER
On 04/26/2007 06:00 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Tie Alan to his chair and take away his keyboard while we submit patches
>> removing MODULE_AUTHOR? Or just apply a trivial two line, optional, non
>> mandatory, patch introducing a MODULE_MAINTAINER? You pick... :-)
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR is extremely important for licensing enforcement. Removing
> it should not be an option.
Yes, the "choice" was obviously in jest. If you say MODULE_AUTHOR must stay,
so must it. As said, that just leaves me wanting a way to override it as a
contact.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists