[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1177607473.6814.103.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:11:13 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2:
hang in atomic copy)
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 10:14 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> > Judging from experience with the wext 32/64 bit fiasco it seems to be
> > rather uncommon to use 32-bit userspace on 64-bit machines.
>
> I disagree...it's quite common. I think its the standard way of doing
> things for ppc64, for instance.
I know. My only 64-bit machine is ppc64 :)
But still nobody noticed the wext 32/64 bit compat bug for like forever.
On the other hand, maybe that just means that most 64-bit machines are
desktop machines without wireless.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists