linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070426173028.GA16886@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:30:28 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	David Lang <david.lang@...italinsight.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, cebbert@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review

On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:48:22AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
>  any idea why there are so many more -stable patches for 2.6.20? this is the 
>  10th -stable series, and most of them have been dozens of patches.
> 
>  is there a new team reporting and fixing bugs? or were there just more small 
>  problems found in 2.6.20 then normal? or something else?

I think it's entirely due to the awesome effort by Chuck Ebbert of Red
Hat.  He has been digging through all of the applied patches to Linus's
tree and been forwarding them on to the stable team.  Without his effort
and help, we would not have so many patches in these releases.

I know I personally owe him at least one beer if I run into him at some
conference, and I think all other users of the stable tree do too.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/