[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070426191336.GB31081@dantu.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:13:37 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ffilz@...ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] NFS: supress warnings about NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID in
nfs4_handle_exception
I recently posted this patch to the nfs mailing list, but got no comment.
Reposting with an actual "[PATCH]" subject...
In certain situations, a NFSv4 client can end up with a set of racing calls
that cause the server to return a NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID error. When this occurs,
the only real recourse that the client has is to retry the call. In the
current code, when this occurs, it triggers a useless printk (in
nfs4_map_errors):
nfs4_map_errors could not handle NFSv4 error 10024
Trond recently mentioned that we really don't need to worry users with that
info. The following patch is based on a suggestion by Frank Filz and supresses
this error. Changing the return code here to 0 should be safe since all callers
of nfs4_handle_exception are expected to retry the call in this situation
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Filz <ffilz@...ibm.com>
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index f52cf5c..b456783 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2774,6 +2774,7 @@ int nfs4_handle_exception(const struct nfs_server *server, int errorcode, struct
break;
case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID:
exception->retry = 1;
+ ret = 0;
}
/* We failed to handle the error */
return nfs4_map_errors(ret);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists