[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070426041612.GD19966@holomorphy.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:16:12 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
Zach Carter <linux@...hcarter.com>,
buddabrod <buddabrod@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:47:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> - upstream fix: SysRq-T should show runnable tasks
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:29:27AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> BTW. can you send this upstream? It is very annoying how it currently works,
> and I've had more than one bug that required seeing runnable tasks in order
> to diagnose and fix...
There are other things that should go upstream separately. The
init/main.c comment fix for one. I'd even argue that scheduler classes
should be done separately from and prior to the specific cfs policy.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists