linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070426204146.GA25142@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:41:46 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Peter Keilty <peter.keilty@...com>
Cc:	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code

On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 04:26:32PM -0400, Peter Keilty wrote:
> From: Peter Keilty <peter.keilty@...com>
> 
> Initial ia64 conversion to the generic timekeeping/clocksource code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Keilty <peter.keilty@...com>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>

The "Signed-off-by:" should reflect the order in which a path is processed
with the last submitter at the bottom of the list.
So if this patch came from John then he should be first in the list
and since the patch passes you and you submit it you should be in the bottom
of the list.

And "Signed-off-by:" tell the path that the patch takes. It is not to be used
to let others say "I have seen it and I think the patch is ok".
For the latter we have "Acked-by:".

I did not look at the code so ne feedback there.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/