[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070426210631.GD24852@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:06:31 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:56:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Yes, probably will. The other option is to break existing 32-bit
> > userspace, which is a bit more common AFAICT.
>
> And *this* is why kernel/userspace things simply should not be done.
>
> It's simply better to do things entirely in the kernel. Because you add
> bugs and complications otherwise, and doing it in the kernel allows you
> to just switch things around.
>
> As it is, it appears that user-space suspend is just broken whichever way
> we turn.
Well, in that case maybe suspend2 should be very seriously considered,
since it has the features of uswsusp --- basic features which every
single Microsoft and MacOSX user are used to like, like progress bars
--- and it's all done in the kernel.
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists