[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0704261520350.9674@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david.lang@...italinsight.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Back to the future.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> This is basically the loop above, made complex by the fact that we do
> not want to have separate partition for snapshot; we just want to
> reuse free space in swap partition.
with the size of drives today is it really that bad to require a seperate
partition for this?
I also don't like the idea of storing this in the swap partition for a couple of
reasons.
1. on many modern linux systems the swap partition is not large enough.
for example, on my boxes with 16G or ram I only allocate 2G of swap space
2. it's too easy for other things to stomp on your swap partition.
for example: booting from a live CD that finds and uses swap partitions
if you are needing space for your freeze, allocate it in an unabigous way, not
by re-useing an existing partition.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists