[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704270018100.5200@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] oom: fix constraint deadlock
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Subject: [patch -mm] oom: fix constraint deadlock
> > Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > Fixes a deadlock in the OOM killer for allocations that are not
> > __GFP_HARDWALL.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Why is this described as "patch -mm"? It applies to mainline. If it's
> fixing a -mm patch, do you know which one?
>
Fair enough. It definitely is applicable to mainline and fixes a deadlock
which we've been struggling with for awhile because not only does it block
while holding callback_mutex, but also tasklist_lock.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists