[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070427072349.GA106@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:23:49 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cancel_delayed_work: use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync()
On 04/27, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> According to workqueue.h:
> > /*
> > * Kill off a pending schedule_delayed_work(). Note that the work callback
> > * function may still be running on return from cancel_delayed_work(). Run
> > * flush_workqueue() or cancel_work_sync() to wait on it.
> > */
> > static inline int cancel_delayed_work(struct delayed_work *work)
>
> So, we can do something like this:
>
> cancel_delayed_work(dwork);
> flush_workqueue(wq);
> kfree(some_obj_used_by_dwork_func);
>
> And this is enough to work with not rearming work.
>
> But no more after this patch...
Yes, you are right, and so this patch is wrong.
This is even documented in the changelog, with this change cancel_delayed_work()
may return while the queueing is in progress. However, in that case we can not
rely on flush_workqueue/cancel_work_sync.
Thanks a lot!
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists